![]() Overall, the RX 6950 XT comes out 14% ahead of the RTX 4070 in rasterization, and that grows to 17% at 4K (but shrinks to 8% at 1080p). There are also outliers like Borderlands 3 where AMD has a massive 35% lead (it's an AMD promoted game, naturally). AMD's RX 6950 XT clearly wins in the rasterization performance bracket, with Total War: Warhammer 3 being the only game to give the RTX 4070 a win at 1440p. Across our suite of games, the two GPUs trade blows. ![]() These are high-end cards, so focusing on the 1440p performance makes the most sense - they're more than fast enough for 1080p but at the same time not usually potent enough for 4K at maxed out settings. Those categories are listed in order of decreasing importance, in our view at least, so we'll start with the critical aspects and move on down the list from there. Then we'll declare a winner, because this isn't soccer and ties aren't allowed. But there's more to this than gaming performance, so let's put them both in a cage and see which one can emerge victorious from the Thunderdome.įor this GPU face off, we'll look at how the two cards stack up in terms of performance, price, features and tech, drivers and software, and power and efficiency. Today, both rank in the upper portion of our GPU benchmarks hierarchy. The RTX 4070 is now on our list of the best graphics cards, and the RX 6950 XT and other Navi 21 variants have been there on and off over the past couple of years. ![]() AMD for its part has no direct current contender, opting instead to encourage price reductions on its existing line of RDNA 2 GPUs like the RX 6950 XT. It's still $599, but that's better than the $799 and higher we've of the earlier RTX 40-series GPUs. Nvidia just launched its fourth Ada Lovelace GPU, the GeForce RTX 4070, which finally brings the latest generation hardware down into the realm of affordability for many gamers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |